FINAL EXAM REVIEW SHEET

The review material here will seem like a lot - but it is all material we have covered in detail through the year, and most of it is from the 2nd Semester. 

The Final Exam will be given over 3 days and will include the following parts:

Multiple Choice

A "Taking A Stand" - Should we adopt a Flag Desecration Amendment (information sheet is below)

Matching - with Core Democratic Value

Matching - with your Map information

Short Answer - with Amendments 1 - 19 (out of the 27 Amendments to the Constitution)

 

The following are topics on which you should focus your study for your final exam.

History topics are listed somewhat in chronological order.

Battle of Bunker Hill

Battle of Trenton

Valley Forge

Battle of Saratoga

French Alliance

Battle of Yorktown

Patriots

Loyalists

Articles of Confederation

Constitution of the United States

Emancipation Proclamation

Declaration of Independence

Federalism

Nullification

War of 1812

Lewis and Clark

Westward Expansion

Inflation

Interchangeable Parts

Missouri Compromise Line

Andrew Jackson

Monroe Doctrine

Suffrage (the different phases)

Trail of Tears

Rendezvous and mountain men

Mormons

Alamo

Underground Railroad

Temperance

Second Great Awakening

Seneca Falls Convention

Cotton Gin

Slavery

Gold Rush

Compromise of 1850

Stephen A. Douglas

John C. Calhoun

Daniel Webster

Fugitive Slave Act

Uncle Tom's Cabin

Dred Scott decision

Bloody Kansas

Republican Party

Monroe Doctrine

John Brown

Whig Party

1860 Presidential election

Secession

Bull Run

Fort Sumter

Appomatox

Antietam

West Virginia

Reasons for fighting the Civil War

Jefferson Davis

Abraham Lincoln

Robert E. Lee

Ulysses S. Grant

Stonewall Jackson

Vicksburg

Siege

Pickett’s Charge

Copperheads

Little Round Top

Income Tax

Poll Tax

10% Plan

Radical Republicans

Amendments 13,14,15, 16, 17, 18, 19

Lincoln’s Assassination

Andrew Johnson

Civil Rights Act of 1871

Scalawags

Carpetbaggers

Rutherford B. Hayes

Samuel Tilden

Entrepreneurs

Immigrants after 1879

Populist Party

Nationalization

Graduated Income Tax

Flat Income Tax

Excise Tax

Jacob Riis

J.P. Morgan

Jane Addams

Cornelius Vanderbilt

John D. Rockefeller

Andrew Carnegie

Henry Ford

Federal Government branches

Constitution ratification

Amendment (definition)

Bill of Rights

Federalist Papers

Veto

Plessy v. Ferguson

Brown v. Board of Education

Marbury v. Madison

 

Economic Terms

Unlimited wants and needs

Limited resources

Scarcity

Opportunity cost

Command economy

Traditional economy

Capitalism/Free Enterprise/Free Market

        economy

 

Social Studies

Final Exam Review - Facts we have learned

 

 

FINAL EXAM – MAPPING  (blank maps were provided by Mr. Reuss)

 

Locate the following on the map provided.

 

MAP 1

Any state in the 13 Original States (or colonies)

Battle of Gettysburg

Battle of Vicksburg

Boston

Ellis Island

Fort Sumter

Harper’s Ferry

New Orleans

Philadelphia

Richmond  (Capital of Confederacy)

Saratoga

Statue of Liberty

Washington D.C.

Yorktown

 

 

MAP 2

Any state in the United States

Border States

Confederate States

Grand Canyon

Mississippi River

Missouri Compromise Line

Missouri River

Ohio River

Sacramento

Salt Lake City

San Antonio

St. Louis

Sutter’s Mill

The Alamo

The Black Hills

Trail of Tears

Yellowstone National Park

Yosemite National Park

 

 

 

CORE DEMOCRATIC VALUES

Basic Definitions

 

Fundamental Beliefs of United States Democracy

 

Life

Your right to life is sacred.

Liberty

You have the right to personal, political, and economic freedom.

The Pursuit of Happiness

You have the right to find happiness in your own way.

Common Good (Public Good)

Individuals must accept our part in improving our society

Justice

All people should be treated fairly and equally.

Equality

Everyone is treated equally in the eyes of the law.

Diversity

Differences among people are good and are welcomed.

Truth

Citizens can demand truth from their government.

Popular Sovereignty

The people have the final say over their government.

Patriotism

Citizens show devotion to our country.

 

Constitutional Principles

Rule of Law

Everyone must follow the law.

Separation of Powers

All power is never in the hands of only one or just a few.

Representative Government

Citizens elect others to represent their interests.

Checks and Balances

Power is balanced among the Executive, Legislative, and Judicial branches.  Each keeps an eye on the other.

Individual Rights

We all have fundamental, unalienable rights.

Freedom of Religion

We can choose our own religious beliefs.  The government cannot dictate religion.

Federalism

Power is shared between the national and state governments.

Civilian Control of the Military

The military forces are under the command of a civilian. (The President)

 

TAKING A STAND:

Should the United States adopt an Amendment to the Constitution which reads:

The Congress shall have power to prohibit the physical desecration of the flag of the United States.

Flag Desecration Amendment

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Flag Desecration Amendment, often referred to as the flag burning amendment, is a controversial proposed constitutional amendment to the United States Constitution that would allow the United States Congress to statutorily prohibit the physical desecration of the flag of the United States. The concept of flag desecration continues to provoke a heated debate over protecting a national symbol and protecting free speech.

While the proposed amendment is most frequently referred to colloquially in terms of flag burning, the language would permit the prohibition of all forms of flag desecration, which may take forms other than burning, such as uses for clothing or napkins.

The most recent attempt to adopt a flag desecration amendment failed in the United States Senate by one vote on June 27, 2006.[1][2]

Proposed amendment

The full text of the amendment (passed several times by the U.S. House of Representatives):

The Congress shall have power to prohibit the physical desecration of the flag of the United States.

This proposed amendment was intended to give Congress the right to enact statutes criminalizing the burning or other desecration of the United States flag in a public protest. Proponents of legislation to proscribe flag burning argue that burning the flag is a very offensive gesture that deserves to be formally outlawed. Opponents maintain that giving Congress such power would essentially limit the principle of freedom of speech—enshrined in the First Amendment to the United States Constitution and symbolized by the flag itself.

Arguments for the amendment

Proponents of the amendment argue that protecting the flag is necessary because of the uniquely important nature of the flag. They argue the flag is the most revered symbol of the United States, and thus burning it is a profoundly offensive gesture towards all its citizens. In his dissenting opinion in Texas v. Johnson, the late Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist wrote,

The American flag, then, throughout more than 200 years of our history, has come to be the visible symbol embodying our Nation. It does not represent the views of any particular political party, and it does not represent any particular political philosophy. The flag is not simply another "idea" or "point of view" competing for recognition in the marketplace of ideas. Millions and millions of Americans regard it with an almost mystical reverence regardless of what sort of social, political, or philosophical beliefs they may have. I cannot agree that the First Amendment invalidates the Act of Congress, and the laws of 48 of the 50 States, which make criminal the public burning of the flag.

Rehnquist also argued that flag burning is "no essential part of any exposition of ideas" but rather "the equivalent of an inarticulate grunt or roar that, it seems fair to say, is most likely to be indulged in not to express any particular idea, but to antagonize others."

Quoting the famous lines, "Shoot if you must, this old grey head, but spare your country's flag," from the Civil War poem, "Barbara Frietchie," he said the flag was "the visible symbol embodying our Nation."

Arguments against the amendment

Opponents of the flag desecration proposal, including civil liberties groups and first amendment defenders, point out the rarity of flag desecration in the United States, and assert that the proposed amendment is the epitome of "a solution in search of a problem". They also say that an amendment making such activity illegal would undermine the very principles for which the flag stands; jailing protesters of dissenting opinion—such as those who burn national flags—is common under authoritarian regimes, such as North Korea or Iran. Another argument stems from the fact that groups such as the American Legion and the Boy Scouts of America regularly burn flags as a way to dispose of them in a respectful manner in keeping with the United States Flag Code. According to this argument, the amendment would single out people who committed the same acts with different intentions - thus, the amendment would regulate free thought, in contradiction to the First Amendment. Additionally, the question arises of what exactly constitutes a "flag". "Do the small, paper flags attached to toothpicks count as one of the sacred items", for example, would be a common question. One could also wonder if, for example, kicking out a chalk flag drawing by walking on it is a form of desecration. It is further pointed out by some opponents that as flag desecration is done as a means of protest, it is, therefore, an attention getting act. Thus calling attention to it by prosecuting and jailing those responsible (and turning them into martyrs and political prisoners in the eyes of their supporters), would serve only to make flag desecration a more attractive means of protest, and would, therefore, increase, rather than decrease the incidence of it.

In light of this argument, the framing of this Amendment as dealing with flag burning is misleading. As the Supreme Court has never declared it unconstitutional to ban the burning of flags, it is not clear that a Constitutional Amendment would be necessary to effect such a ban. Indeed, most localities have ordinances restricting the burning of any material, flags included. In Texas v. Johnson, the Supreme Court did not find that it is unconstitutional to ban the burning of flags, but that it is unconstitutional to ban the expression of particular political views through the burning of flags. Thus, this Amendment is aimed not at banning the burning of flags, but at banning the expression of particular political views through the burning of flags.

Furthermore, it must be understood that while this is presented as preventing flag burning, the term "desecration" refers to a much broader range of activities, and in fact can be applied to anything that is determined to be "disrespectful", including not only affirmative acts, but failures to act. Previous arrests under flag-desecration laws have been made for symbolic desecration such as failure to salute the flag, refusal to pledge allegiance to the flag, and speaking contemptuously of the flag. Some Jehovah’s Witnesses, Muslims, and others feel that the pledge and salute elevate the flag above the status of God. Amending the Constitution in order to make flag desecration laws possible might also result in the imprisonment of members of these religious groups. Additionally, many American citizens fear one day being forced to salute the flag and being legally coerced into saying the pledge of allegiance if this amendment is enacted.

In the majority opinion in Texas v. Johnson, Justice William J. Brennan wrote: "We do not consecrate the flag by punishing its desecration, for in doing so we dilute the freedom that this cherished emblem represents."

 

Article Reprinted from:

Flag Desecration Amendment. (2007, April 15). In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Retrieved 12:10, May 24, 2007, from http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Flag_Desecration_Amendment&oldid=122925400

 

How to do a TAKING A STAND

 

 

Take a stand on a public issue.  You may either support or oppose the issue in question.  Write a letter to the editor or a letter to another appropriate person or group.  Use information from your source and your previous knowledge to provide reasons that support your position.

 

 

              You will be graded on the following, so be sure your letter includes

              each of the elements listed below:

 

              *  A clear and supported statement of your position

 

              *  Supporting information using core democratic values of

                 American constitutional democracy

                 (See your CDV sheet for examples.)

 

              *  Supporting knowledge from history, geography, civics, or

                  economics that you already know

                  (make connections:  It is not enough to state only your opinion.)

 

              *  Supporting information from the Data Section

                  (the Data Section is your news article or other source of  information)

 

              *  Conclusion